Are DSLRs and online photography resources (Flickr, SmugMug, Facebook, blogs, etc) “democratizing” photography (for better or worse)? Is the old model of a few well-known specialists, formerly protected by darkroom availability, slow learning curves (waiting for film to be developed to see results) and high cost (of shooting several hundred thousand photos to develop skill) breaking down? Are the iconic film photographers adequately adapting to new sharing and networking technologies, or will the prolific and fast-moving relative newcomers of the digital age be more appealing to, and do a better job connecting with, the millions of new photography hobbyists who are rapidly acquiring skill on their new DSLRs?
As sites such as iStockPhoto undermine the pricing for stock photography, what might replace that model, Google AdSense revenue?
Many of us are used to pursuing landscape photography with focal lengths that range from…
This was one of those "stop the car" moments. Snowy Telescope Peak had nice side…
The Geminids are the most active meteor shower of the year, and in recent years…
I was asked this question earlier today, and the more I thought of it, the…
So called "super bloom" years make it easy to find wildflowers in Death Valley, but…
We've reached a major milestone on our workshop program: we celebrated completing ten years of…
This website uses cookies.