Excerpt from the article:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/tech/social-media/instagram-terms-users/?hpt=hp_t3
…the language that's upsetting some of the app's more than 100 million users says that "a business or other entity may pay" Instagram for the use of user images and may do so "without any compensation to you."
That didn't sit well with some — including Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's wedding photographer.
"Pro or not if a company wants to use your photos for advertising they need to TELL you and PAY you," +Noah Kalina Tuesday on Twitter.
Embedded Link
Instagram backtracks after user privacy revolt
Users of Instagram, the popular photo-sharing app, were up in arms Tuesday over language that appears to give the company ownership of their images.
Google+: Reshared 10 times
Google+: View post on Google+
This was one of those "stop the car" moments. Snowy Telescope Peak had nice side…
The Geminids are the most active meteor shower of the year, and in recent years…
I was asked this question earlier today, and the more I thought of it, the…
So called "super bloom" years make it easy to find wildflowers in Death Valley, but…
We've reached a major milestone on our workshop program: we celebrated completing ten years of…
Spring 2022 is shaping up to be a very busy year in Death Valley, like…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
I get the feeling cases like this is the result of over zealous lawyers writting ELUAs. A businessman should realize this is bad business. Any lawyers out there wiling to confirm or deny?
Facebook should know this by now though.
Max, it's verbage... they will not roll back what they have already stipulated.
I have cancelled my account on FB a while ago and did the same yesterday with Instagram